Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jozo Grgic; Brad J Schoenfeld; John Orazem; Filip Sabol
Journal of sport and health science, 2022
SR / meta-analysisCC BY-NC-NDData current as of 25 Oct 2026
No-derivatives licence: text is shown verbatim and unmodified, never summarised.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of training to muscle failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy. METHODS: Meta-analyses of effect sizes (ESs) explored the effects of training to failure vs. non-failure on strength and hypertrophy. Subgroup meta-analyses explored potential moderating effects of variables such as training status (trained vs. untrained), training volume (volume equated vs. volume non-equated), body region (upper vs. lower), exercise selection (multi- vs. single-joint exercises (only for strength)), and study design (independent vs. dependent groups). RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the review. All studies included young adults as participants. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between the training conditions for muscular strength (ES = -0.09, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): -0.22 to 0.05) and for hypertrophy (ES = 0.22, 95%CI: -0.11 to 0.55). Subgroup analyses that stratified the studies according to body region, exercise selection, or study design showed no significant differences between training conditions. In studies that did not equate training volume between the groups, the analysis showed significant favoring of non-failure training on strength gains (ES = -0.32, 95%CI: -0.57 to -0.07). In the subgroup analysis for resistance-trained individuals, the analysis showed a significant effect of training to failure for muscle hypertrophy (ES = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.03-0.26). CONCLUSION: Training to muscle failure does not seem to be required for gains in strength and muscle size. However, training in this manner does not seem to have detrimental effects on these adaptations, either. More studies should be conducted among older adults and highly trained individuals to improve the generalizability of these findings.
Source: PubMed. Shown under the article’s CC BY-NC-ND licence.
Where this study is used
- Proximity to failure: Muscle hypertrophy (direct imaging) (Adults) — Low. Counted in the grade.
- Proximity to failure: Muscle hypertrophy (direct imaging) (Trained adults) — Low. Counted in the grade.
- Proximity to failure: Muscle hypertrophy (direct imaging) (Untrained adults) — Low. Counted in the grade.
Extracted values
AI-assisted extraction: each number comes with the sentence it was read from.
- Studies pooled
- 15
- Participants pooled
- 394
| Field | Value | Source sentence |
|---|---|---|
| Review question | We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of training to muscle failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy. | Show quote for Review questionWe aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of training to muscle failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy. Located at |
| Population | young adults | Show quote for PopulationAll studies included young adults as participants Located at |
| Intervention · Agent | resistance training | Show quote for Intervention · Agentresistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure Located at |